CHIEF Justice Godfrey Chidyausiku is on Tuesday next week expected to conduct a pre-hearing of the constitutional application filed by Bikita West MP Munyaradzi Kereke, who is seeking to have his ex-boss, former Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe (RBZ) governor Gideon Gono, prosecuted over alleged acts of corruption.
CHARLES LAITON SENIOR COURT REPORTER
On Monday this week, Chief Registrar Walter Chikwanha, wrote to the two “warring” parties’ lawyers advising them of the May 27 date on which Chidyausiku would deliberate on the matter.
The matter would then be heard by the full Constitutional Court (Concourt) bench on a date to be announced later.
Early this year Kereke, Gono’s ex-advisor, filed a Concourt application seeking to compel the Zimbabwe Anti-Corruption Commission (Zacc) to investigate Gono on graft charges allegedly committed while he was at the helm of the central bank.
In his application Kereke argued that failure by Zacc to investigate allegations of abuse of office, corruption and theft, levelled against Gono was unconstitutional.
He said the commission had an obligation to receive and consider complaints from members of the public. Responding to Kereke’s application, Gono said the claims were baseless.
“The instant application is clearly one that is short on the law, but long on heat, malice and verbiage,” he said.
- Chamisa under fire over US$120K donation
- Mavhunga puts DeMbare into Chibuku quarterfinals
- Pension funds bet on Cabora Bassa oilfields
- Councils defy govt fire tender directive
Keep Reading
The former governor further said in order for Kereke’s application to succeed, the court would have to establish among other issues, whether the claim was justiciable at law and/or whether the Concourt had the jurisdiction to grant the remedy sought.
In his heads of arguments filed at the court yesterday, Gono maintained he acted above board in all mandates while with the central bank and allegations levelled against him by Kereke were proved by Zacc to be untrue.
Instead Gono said if there were some acts of corrupt activities at the RBZ, Kereke was the man to be answerable since he was the one who brokered the alleged deals.
Gono said the fact that investigations might not have progressed at Kereke’s desired pace or resulted in an outcome that favoured him does not elevate the present case to the constitutional crisis which Kereke wanted it to be.
