As South Africa prepares for the high-stakes 2026 local government elections, a familiar and chilling shadow is lengthening across the Limpopo.
Political leaders and government institutions have been identified as the primary architects of a burgeoning hostility targeting foreign nationals, with critics warning that the country is once again descending into a cycle of “manufactured” xenophobic violence.
At the heart of the current anxiety is a looming nationwide protest scheduled for May 4.
The demonstration, which is slated to commence at the historic Mary Fitzgerald Square, is being spearheaded by a group identifying itself as the Concerned Citizens of South Africa.
Their demands are as uncompromising as they are dangerous and they include the immediate removal of all foreign nationals from South African soil.
More alarmingly, the group has explicitly threatened to take unilateral action if the state fails to meet their ultimatums, raising the spectre of vigilante violence in urban centres across the country.
The organisers have not limited their pressure to the streets as they have directed a formal memorandum to President Cyril Ramaphosa and other high-ranking officials, including the leadership of the South African National Defence Forces (SANDF).
- ED heads for Marange
- ‘Zimbos dreading 2023 elections’
- Zim headed for a political dead heat in 2023
- Your Excellency, the buck stops with you
Keep Reading
For the millions of Zimbabweans living across the border, these developments represent a terrifying escalation of rhetoric that has been simmering for years.
Critics of the current administration argue that this latest wave of mobilisation is far from a spontaneous grassroots movement.
Instead, they describe it as a manufactured crisis, meticulously shaped by years of political messaging designed to scapegoat migrants for the country’s deep-seated structural failings.
Nomagugu Khumalo, a Zimbabwean founder of Gukurahundi Genocide Survivors 4 Justice, has been particularly vocal about the state’s role in this decay.
She argued that the government’s consistent failure to act decisively against perpetrators has effectively normalised attacks on foreigners.
In a scathing assessment of the current climate, Khumalo described South Africa as a lawless country where the thin veneer of the Rainbow Nation has finally peeled away.
“Perpetrators of such heinous acts have the full backing of powers that be, otherwise they would have been arrested by now,” Khumalo said, highlighting the perceived complicity of the state.
“People are assaulted in full view of law enforcement officers, yet nothing happens. That silence is not neutral—it is enabling.”
Khumalo’s analysis pointed to a cynical electoral calculus.
She believes that as the 2026 elections draw closer, political actors have instrumentalised anti-foreigner sentiment as a core strategy for voter mobilisation.
“As elections approach, targeting foreigners becomes a convenient way to mobilise frustrated voters,” she said.
“It shifts attention away from governance failures such as unemployment, corruption, inequality, and redirects anger toward vulnerable communities.”
This redirecting of anger relies heavily on the proliferation of myths, chief among them the claim that foreigners are “stealing” economic opportunities from locals.
Khumalo dismissed these assertions as politically convenient lies, noting that migrants frequently occupy the very roles that locals refuse, serving as essential cogs in the economy as workers, consumers, tenants, and entrepreneurs.
The economic consequences of a mass exodus of foreign nationals would be catastrophic, Khumalo warned.
“But does South Africa truly believe it can survive in a vacuum? Imagine if every foreigner packed and left,” she said.
“Taxis won’t have passengers, property owners will lose revenue, and very few people will buy from shops. The economy would literally collapse.”
Economists support this view, indicating that South Africans’ grievances—primarily unemployment and abysmal service delivery—were rooted in systemic internal challenges rather than migration.
Studies consistently show that migrants are often the backbone of sectors experiencing chronic labour shortages, including domestic work, agriculture, construction, and the informal trade sector.
Despite these economic realities, the government’s response has been marked by a profound inconsistency.
While public condemnations of xenophobia are issued from high offices, they are rarely matched by enforcement on the ground.
Despite strict laws prohibiting vigilantism, groups continue to openly intimidate or physically attack foreign nationals with near-total impunity.
Diana Runako Chambara, the programmes manager at the Zimbabwe Exiles’ Forum, views these developments through the lens of a longer, darker history of what she terms institutionalised Afrophobia.
“We believe the messages are a continuation of the Afrophobia sentiments that have been circulating within South Africa since 2008, albeit with varying degrees of intensity,” Chambara said.
Given the rising heat, she has issued a stark warning to the Zimbabwean diaspora: regularise your residence status immediately or consider relocating as a matter of urgency.
The tension is no longer theoretical; it is physical. Community leaders report that the atmosphere is reaching a boiling point in Johannesburg, Pretoria, Durban, and parts of the Limpopo province.
These are areas with high concentrations of Zimbabwean migrants, many of whom are now living in a state of constant vigilance.
Even within the state apparatus, some voices are raised in warning.
KwaZulu-Natal police commissioner lieutenant-general Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi recently cautioned that the growing anti-foreigner protests risk turning into something far more dangerous and discriminatory.
He said these marches are increasingly and specifically targeting black African foreign nationals, further highlighting the Afrophobic nature of the movement.
Mkhwanazi has been firm in his stance that private citizens have no legal right to act as immigration officers.
He pointed out that local communities lack both the authority and the technical capacity to determine the legal status of individuals in the country.
Such actions, he warned, lead to direct threats, attacks on legitimate businesses, and the high risk of South Africans themselves being wrongly identified as foreigners based on appearance or language.
“They also do not have the responsibility, as citizens, to check documentation because they lack the skills to determine whether the papers a person is holding are legitimate or not,” Mkhwanazi was quoted as saying.
While he encouraged citizens to share information with the police, he insisted that the state must remain the sole arbiter of the law.
“We will investigate and, if confirmed, take the necessary steps, including deportation,” Mkhwananzi said.
The stakes for Zimbabwe could not be higher. Estimates of the Zimbabwean diaspora are staggering, ranging from three million to over five million people—accounting for roughly 30% of Zimbabwe’s entire population.
While the 2022 Zimstat census reported a conservative figure of 900 000 residents abroad, this is widely understood to be an undercount due to the nature of undocumented migration.
South Africa remains the primary destination, hosting anywhere from 574 000 to well over a million Zimbabweans.
As May 4 approaches, the regional implications of South Africa’s “manufactured crisis” loom large.
For the millions of Zimbabweans who have made South Africa their home, the question is no longer just about economic survival, but whether they can survive the political currents of a neighbor that increasingly views their presence as a campaign tool.
Ends
