Guruve RDC hit with US$300 000 lawsuit

The letter states that Marisa was acquitted on June 3, 2025, after full trial at the Harare Magistrates Court on two counts of criminal abuse of office and one count of theft of bricks.

GURUVE Rural District Council has been served with a US$300 000 lawsuit following the acquittal of its former chief executive officer, Tinos Marisa, who was facing criminal charges.

His legal team claims that council pursued a baseless and malicious prosecution, causing its client reputational harm and financial strain.  

In a letter dated July 8, Marisa’s lawyers, Ngwerume Attorneys, accused the local authority of ignoring legal advice and proceeding with what they describe as “unsustainable” charges.

The letter states that Marisa was acquitted on June 3, 2025, after full trial at the Harare Magistrates Court on two counts of criminal abuse of office and one count of theft of bricks.

According to the letter, key council witnesses allegedly turned hostile during trial and the court reportedly noted inconsistencies in the prosecution’s case. 

The lawyers said the charges were politically motivated.

On the first charge, involving borehole drilling, the lawyers claim Marisa had obtained permission from the then council chairperson Ngoni Jeke and later repaid council, which they say acknowledged his actions as legitimate.

The second charge, related to the alleged misuse of council lawyers, was dismissed after evidence showed that council had summoned legal representation for work-related matters.

The third charge, concerning the alleged theft of 3 000 bricks, collapsed after records proved that council had only paid for 27 000 bricks, despite claiming ownership of 30 000.

The letter further alleges that acting CEO one Sibanda, town engineer Joyline Mandisodza and another official Chikanya, gave false testimony in an effort to “fix” Marisa. 

His legal team is demanding US$300 000 in compensation on his behalf within seven days, warning that failure to comply will result in further legal action, including higher cost penalties.

Related Topics